Ads

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

My rating

Rate
Rate the shows you've watched and get up-to-date recommendations
3.59
MyShows
(3 624)
Released: 15 December 2015
Country of origin: US
Genre: Adventure, Action, Sci-Fi
Production companies: Lucasfilm Ltd., Bad Robot
Watched by: 10 085 of 865 198
Runtime: 2 hours 16 minutes
IMDB rating: 7.8 of 10 973 420
kinopoisk.ru rating: 7.07 of 10 283 395

Description

Thirty years after defeating the Galactic Empire, Han Solo and his allies face a new threat from the evil Kylo Ren and his army of Stormtroopers.

Watch 9

Subscription
Purchase
$19.99
$7.99
$3.59
$19.99
$5.99
$19.99
$3.99
$9.99
$3.99
$19.99
$3.99
$19.99
$3.99
Rent
$7.99
$3.59
$19.99
$5.99
$19.99
$3.99
$9.99
$3.99
$3.99
$19.99
$3.99
$19.99
$3.99

Trailers 14

Star Wars: The Force Awakens Trailer (Official)
Star Wars: The Force Awakens In-Home Trailer

Related movies 8

Also watching 40

Discuss this movie 7

Na_Sana
Na_Sana
03 Oct 2022, 00:42 #
the best of all viewed
Reply
Show
who liked?
-5
Геворг
Геворг
PRO
02 Jan 2023, 18:11 #
I watched all the films like a non-fan, but the average viewer is all interesting and good
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
id440426744
id440426744
17 Jan 2023, 20:43 #
Rey, of course, is a terribly unfinished character - in all films she is different
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
Perish
Perish
PRO
18 Mar 2023, 19:01 #
Poor Abrams tried so hard not to spoil something that he took the script of old films, replaced the names in it and made a couple of author's strokes, for example, a monkey jumping, almost the whole movie (and no, I'm not talking about Chewie) with a lightsaber, giving out pearls according to all modern stupidest canons; Clever, beautiful, Komsomol - Ray, who knows everything and knows how, right up to the top of the absurd (glory to neo-feminism, so far logic). In short, an hour and a half of crazy action, just like you love, my 12-14 year-old connoisseurs of the era of Marvel crafts!
Reply
Show
who liked?
+14
Redopera
Redopera
03 Aug 2023, 12:43 #
I went to the cinema honestly without expectations. The most emotional intensity was experienced in the previous trilogy, so I was counting on just a movie based on the precepts of the saga. IMAX is able to smooth out large irregularities by immersing itself in technology. But not in those cases when you have to look closely at what is happening and ask yourself the question "How is this so?". Firstly, by the end of the film, there was a feeling of repeating one of the paintings of the first trilogy. Ja-Ja Abrams kept the formula of the painting, but substituted his components and synthesized crazy fan fiction. Secondly, the disregard for the precepts of the saga did not let go for a long time after watching it. I love watching in cinemas, but to be so outraged as after this movie, I don't remember any more such cases. I was sorry for the time and money spent. I was not some kind of oldfag, at the age of 24 it was still too early to remember about the greener grass, but it used to be. But the fact that the force and other Jedi wisdom became available to almost every acting character in this film seriously pissed me off. Let Vishate, Revan and Starkiller stop spaceships by force and fight armies - this is all in the games, there is initially a role-playing and the whole canvas is eventually launched on a non-canon. They stuck new handsome characters on themselves, put them on a par with the poor devils from the old guard and showed how to set up hyperdrive! And while the worthy Mandalorian barely moves his lightsaber from season to season, the defective Black stormtrooper takes this weapon into his own hands with playful ease. But General Grievous also used lightsabers, and he's a cyborg!? - Yes, because Count Dooku taught him all the Jedi wisdom. And here we have a scavenger, a stormtrooper and a half-educated son for three thinking about a neon party with the death star, the first order and the imperials. I won't get excited any further, they don't wave their fists after a fight, 8 years have passed, so the basic and unchangeable theses have stood the test of time. The other 2 paintings will try to explain all this craziness, unconvincingly and with a note of disappointment.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Evittta
Evittta
25 Dec 2023, 12:26 #
I came to the film as I watched the universe. It is quite obvious that Abrams did not set himself the task of catching up and even more so surpassing the prequel saga or the original one, without taking the plot into space, but globally a classic mistake for large-scale cinema of recent years was made - this is the plot unambiguity of the GG. It was necessary to take an example from the character of Vader: he is complex, interesting, tragic and causes sincere compassion of the viewer even in the role of the antagonist. What do we see here? New characters with an overdose of meritness, a racial agenda and an attempt to leave the cast of actors from previous parts. And it's not about the lousy acting, there are generally no complaints, but the fact that the originality of the plot is zero, but the film opens a new trilogy. And after that, the feeling does not leave that the universe of STARS is no longer the same and will never be, because although they took the general theme of the confrontation between good and evil into the base of new stories, they could not really convey it, and therefore similar foam films will only be molded on this foam base in
the future. P.S. it is not surprising, that after the release of the final Saga, the world of the universe of STARS decided to shoot TV series between and before the main events of the Saga.
Reply
Show
who liked?
SophietheValiant
SophietheValiant
20 Mar 03:32 #
Some kind of porridge-malasha, to be honest, but Ray is cool, and Dameron got into the heart after all, haha 😃
Reply
Show
who liked?
Add a comment:
Ads