Ads

Meg 2: The Trench

Meg 2: The Trench

My rating

Rate
Rate the shows you've watched and get up-to-date recommendations
3.25
MyShows
(718)
Released: 02 August 2023
Country of origin: China, US
Genre: Action, Sci-Fi, Horror/Supernatural
Production companies: Apelles Entertainment, Warner Bros. Pictures, di Bonaventura Pictures, CMC Pictures, Onaroll Productions, DF Pictures
Watched by: 1 651 of 865 931
Runtime: 1 hour 56 minutes
IMDB rating: 5 of 10 78 358

Description

An exploratory dive into the deepest depths of the ocean of a daring research team spirals into chaos when a malevolent mining operation threatens their mission and forces them into a high-stakes battle for survival.

Watch 11

Subscription
Purchase
$14.99
$4.19
$14.99
$3.99
$14.99
$3.99
$14.99
$3.99
$19.99
$5.99
$14.99
$3.99
Rent
$14.99
$4.19
$14.99
$3.99
$14.99
$3.99
$14.99
$3.99
$3.99
$19.99
$5.99
$14.99
$3.99

Trailers 18

Official Trailer
Magic

Related movies 1

Also watching 55

Discuss this movie 25

Irish_Ethan
Irish_Ethan
11 Aug 2023, 21:51 #
A three-star movie.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+6
Gordey
Gordey
14 Aug 2023, 08:37 #
If in the first part the main problem was still connected with the megalodon, then in the second the giant shark is just a background, although the film begins with an epic scene of megalodon devouring an unwary tyrannosaurus rex hunting small toothy amphibians about two meters in length. No, the battle with the shark was not avoided here either, as with these amphibians and giant kraken, who also got out of this abyss (sorry for the small spoiler), but still the main problem was clearly not in the monsters, which I did not like in the film. Of course, it's understandable, Jason needs to demonstrate his skills somewhere, but in the first part they did without it normally, and then, apparently, they decided to screw it up to the fullest! I don't want to say that it doesn't look good, but on the whole it seems far-fetched. They mixed everything into one pile and turned out to be such a vinaigrette, which seems to be dynamic and interesting and spectacular, but so stupid that it reduces the testicles! Action for the sake of action and don't care about internal logic , alas.. Yes, the Statham still looks amazing, the monsters are drawn qualitatively, but what a stupidity!.. Although you can still watch the movie, you can relax in the evening, under strong (or not so strong) alcoholic beverages, otherwise you may not be able to turn off the brain, which will deprive you of the lion's share of viewing pleasure!
Reply
Show
who liked?
+15
Hidji
Hidji
27 Aug 2023, 17:51 #
Well, at least the first film had something besides entertainment, albeit a little, but the second one... As with the last parts of the Fast and the Furious - I want to nail the screenwriters😅
Reply
Show
who liked?
+5
san
san
28 Aug 2023, 18:54 #
The wildest kringe. The most unpleasant thing that I didn't like about the film is the actress playing a teenager. I watched it only for Statham's sake, because I watch all the movies with him.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+11
kprodo
kprodo
28 Aug 2023, 18:56 #
Only two... And that's because of Statham
Reply
Show
who liked?
+6
АлександрЗахаров
АлександрЗахаров
30 Aug 2023, 01:48 #
Bad, bad. 2/5
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
p4ss3rby
p4ss3rby
30 Aug 2023, 11:12 #
It's strange to expect some kind of masterpiece, realism, etc. from another Statham movie. I wanted to see how this elusive bald guy fucks with a shark - I got it.
The first half of the film is boring and drawn out, but at the end it becomes more cheerful, well, normal.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+11
w1semc
w1semc
01 Sep 2023, 23:59 #
The action at the end pulled the film to 3.5/5. In general, the film is quite passable, for once. But nothing else was expected)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+6
AnnaAV
AnnaAV
PRO
03 Sep 2023, 16:00 #
How that girl Meing infuriated me😬 That's the first thing I think about when it comes to this movie. Statham is very good. The plot is average. I laughed with a breath-holding fiction "a la fish". It was quite spectacular, but I definitely won't review it)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+14
Sondrea
Sondrea
07 Sep 2023, 02:28 #
We were also very infuriated by this girl! The actress's acting is very bad, the heroine herself is terrifyingly insensitive, climbs everywhere, can't argue anything, she needs to poke everywhere, and everyone flies over her and saves her like a princess 🤦🏻♀️
Reply
Show
who liked?
+8
AnnaAV
AnnaAV
PRO
16 Sep 2023, 00:06 #
Dada, actually, because of her stupidity, she causes such emotions to a greater extent. Maybe it would be more pleasant to watch this movie with a different actress and slightly different lines)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+6
Сериальщик732
Сериальщик732
05 Sep 2023, 02:54 #
I was watching from behind the stack
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
augustintx
augustintx
10 Sep 2023, 18:21 #
The first half also seemed delayed, although everything seemed to be in the subject there, they decided to hit the horror straight a la Prometheus or something like that. although it may be too long for me personally, because I don't like this kind of thing. when they got out from under the water, everything had already gone cool and fun
, and it was also frustrating that the character of Xu'in was not returned in this film
Reply
Show
who liked?
TIC_TAC
TIC_TAC
17 Sep 2023, 20:28 #
I just couldn't enjoy the trash going on in the movie because of the actress playing a teenage girl. The character's actions are stupid to the point of outrage, the actress is incompetent and she looks 30 years old.

The first half of the movie is boring, the second half is stupid. It was a complete failure, although I really liked the first Meg.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+5
Zaorish
Zaorish
PRO
20 Sep 2023, 16:43 #
"In a fight with prehistoric creatures, size is not the main thing. The main thing is the size of dignity" ©Jason Statham
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
alexander444
alexander444
24 Sep 2023, 13:18 #
Joyfully
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
vk531418
vk531418
02 Oct 2023, 20:56 #
At first, I wanted to write a huge analysis, because from very positive emotions in the beginning, the impression deteriorated and deteriorated, but by the end all the advantages were erased by some kind of comedic stupid plot. Well, maybe it's some special new trash genre. There are a lot of things to say, but the main disadvantage is the script and the replicas \ actions of the characters. Just clowning around
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
UlNECУлНЕК
UlNECУлНЕК
16 Oct 2023, 08:11 #
The film is average. I looked at it once and forgot. I liked only the first excerpt from the film, before the words present.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
KatieSenorita
KatieSenorita
PRO
07 Nov 2023, 00:04 #
I finally got to this movie and it's safe to say that the movie is not bad. At the beginning of the film, I immediately remember Jurassic Park 1 and 2. The first part is certainly better than the second. You can watch it once, no more)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
_CHASER_
_CHASER_
PRO
15 Nov 2023, 17:03 #
The film at once, about pressure without a spacesuit is very funny
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
id5098067
id5098067
11 Jan 13:30 #
A woman who managed to breathe up to 26% oxygen when the rest had 50-65% left. How is that? What kind of panic is she having that she's breathing 2-2.5 times faster?

The dude from comic-con didn't wear the story armor, and therefore decided to touch everything unknown and dangerous at such a depth. "Strangers" he definitely did not look. He also stood up like a fool while everyone was walking.

Pressure under the weight of 6-8km of water thickness:
A statham without an underwater exoskeleton-wetsuit does not feel discomfort, although 5 minutes ago this water pushed the helmet inside the team-mate.

The villain who didn't kill Statham, but practically saved him. Why not kill Statham while he's out? Oh, yes, I forgot. The story armor. By the way, it is unknown when he would have recovered and managed to save his friends if the villain had not stirred him up.

The villain, who rose behind them on a buoy (or what is it called?), as if on a balloon, did not hear anything about the caisson disease.

That was the only thing that caught my eye.
I looked at the rest as a good action with a juicy picture.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
HermineAslanyan
HermineAslanyan
14 Jan 08:14 #
Well, you can watch it once)))
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
plyuschenkova
plyuschenkova
19 Jan 16:09 #
The film is for one time and it does not compare with the first part
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
notevgenievna
notevgenievna
24 Feb 00:08 #
That's what happens when the commercial success of a movie eats into the eyes of its creators. Apart from a couple of characters, this film has nothing to do with Meg 1. Sharks look bad and not in the sense that the graphics are on top. The film was shot with Jason Statham to feature Jason Statham.
Reply
Show
who liked?
Archamanchrya38
Archamanchrya38
12 Apr 08:08 #
Wow, that's the fantasy of the screenwriters. Three giant kraken out of five
Reply
Show
who liked?
Add a comment:
Ads